Project Team Rewards 
Literature 
80 
Singh, A & Shoura, MM 2006, A life cycle evaluation of change in an engineering 
organization: A case study, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 24, 
pp. 337-348. 
Sirota, D 2004, Case Study: Changing the Culture to Foster Team Work, IHRIM 
Journal, November/December 2004, pp. 4-11. 
Slavin, RE 1991, Group Reward Make Groupwork Work: Response to Kohn, 
Educational Leadership, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 89-91. 
Sohal, AS Terziovski, M & Zutshi, A 2003, Team-based strategy at Varian Australia: a 
case study, Technovation, vol. 23, pp. 349-357. 
Sprenger, RK 2002, Mythos Motivation, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.  
Sreafeimidis, V & Smithson, S 1996, The Management of Change for Information 
Systems Evaluation Practice: Experience from a Case Study, International Journal 
of Information Management, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 205-217. 
Stewart, DW & Kamins, MA 1993, Secondary Research: Information Sources and 
Methods, second edition, SAGE Publications, London. 
Swink, ML Sandvig, JC & Mabert, VA 1996, Customizing Concurrent Engineering 
Processes: Five Case Studies, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 13, 
no. 3, pp. 229-244. 
Tampoe, M & Thurloway, L 1993, Project management: the use and abuse of techniques 
and teams (reflections from a motivation and environment study), International 
Journal of Project Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 245-250. 
Taylor, FW 1911, The principles of scientific management, Harper & Brothers, New 
York,. 
Teo, EAL Ling, FYY & Chong, AFW 2005, Framework for project managers to manage 
construction safety, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 23, pp. 329-
341. 
  
    | Please note: All rights of this webpage are reserved. No part of this  webpage may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in  any form or by any means electronic, mechanic, photocopying, recording or  otherwise without the prior written permission by the author. This html version of the book Project Team Rewards: Rewarding and Motivating your Project Team is not suitable for referencing since page numbers and layout may differ from the original book. Layout flaws are due to converting difficulties from the original file format to html and are not present in the paper copy of the book. |