Navigation bar
  Home Start Previous page
 82 of 118 
Next page End 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87

Buy the book now...

Project Team Rewards
Literature
65
8. Literature
Aguanno, K 2003, 101 Ways
To Reward Team Members, Multi-Media Publications,
Ontario. 
Andersen, ES Grude, KV & Haug, T 2004, Goal Directed Project Management: Effective
Techniques and Strategies, third edition, Kogan Page Limited, London.
APM, Association for Project Management 2000, Body of Knowledge (APM BoK), fourth
edition, G & E 2000 Limited, Peterborough. 
APM, Association for Project Management 2002, Project Management Pathways, The
Association of Project Management, Buckinghamshire. 
Appelbaum, SH Bethune, M & Tannenbaum, R 1999, ‘Downsizing and the emergence of
self-managed teams’, Participation & Empowerment: An International Journal, vol.
7, no. 5, pp. 109-130.
Appelbaum, SH Shpiro, BT Danakas, H Gualtieri, G Li, L Loo, D Renaud, P & Zampieri,
N 2004, ‘Internal Communication issues in an IT engineering department’,
Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 6-24.
Armstrong, M & Murlis, H 2004, Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration
Strategy and Practice, fifth edition, Kogan Page Limited, London.
Armstrong, M 2000, Rewarding Teams, IPD House, London.
Armstrong, M 2002, Employee Reward, third edition, CIPD House, London.
Arthur, D 2001, The Employee Recruitment and Retention Handbook, AMACOM, New
York. 
Atkinson, R 1999, ‘Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a
phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria’, International Journal of
Project Management, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 337-342.
Previous page Top Next page
Please note: All rights of this webpage are reserved. No part of this webpage may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanic, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission by the author. This html version of the book Project Team Rewards: Rewarding and Motivating your Project Team is not suitable for referencing since page numbers and layout may differ from the original book. Layout flaws are due to converting difficulties from the original file format to html and are not present in the paper copy of the book.